First Things First

Monday, November 30th, 2009

Congratulations Richard (aka The Passionate Foodie). You are the winner of the Wine Spectator guessing game. Thanks to everybody else for participating and my apologies for the delay in making this announcement. It’s been busy, for a lot of reasons (one of which you’ll read about in the next post).

Richard will get a gift certificate to domaine547. Yay! BTW, everybody did really well this time. Last year, the number of correct guesses was way lower. I’m very impressed.

Spoiler Alert: Wine Spectator Top Ten Sneak Peak…What??!?

Monday, November 16th, 2009

In their annual countdown to their Top Ten Wines of the Year, usually the Wine Spectator releases wines 100 through 11 for subscribers a day early, and then reveals the top 10 in a countdown on their website, over the course of a week or so.

This morning, they gave a sneak peek to subscribers of the entire top 100. A mistake? I’m not sure. I think they were trying to boost subscriptions by charging for access to the full list, a week in advance of when non-subscribers gain access to the list. But we all know how information gets disseminated online. Rapidly. Widely. Etc.

Suspense has been suspended as far as the Top Ten is concerned, and suffice it to say, the annual d547 contest is closed for entries. I’ll mull through the handful of entries and try to come up with a winner (a few people seem to have gotten a few wines correct, so we may end up with a split prize again).

And in the spirit of democratization of information via the internet, here’s a snapshot of the WS Top 10 for those of you who aren’t subscribers:

Most of you realize that I don’t take these rankings seriously, and I like to have fun with it, poke fun at it, etc. I don’t stock most of the high scoring wines in my shop (Telegraphe excepted), and don’t chase points (though I do admit to making a stupid Bordeaux purchase of the Rauzan-Segla last year amidst the hype; and I totally regret said purchase). But I still enjoy my own Top Ten contest, as making a game out of it usually results in the initiation of some sort of dialogue regarding scores, subectivity, etc.

Suffice it to say, I think that in its quest for paying subscribers, the Spectator actually took a lot of wind out of its own sails and kind of killed the fun of the countdown.

My biggest disappointment, though, comes in that I don’t get the usual five or six blog posts out of the countdown and only get this one. And, of course, it’s all about me.

ADDENDUM: You don’t even need to become a subscriber to get the Top Ten Sneak Peak. Sokolin already has several of the wines for sale on its site, with an animated banner showing each of those available and their rankings.

Annual Hijinks: Wine Spectator Top 100 Wines of 2009 Guessing Game

Friday, October 16th, 2009

It’s nearly upon us…the countdown to the Wine Spectator Top 100 Wines of the Year. For the third year in a row, I’ll be hosting a contest in which you’ll submit your guesses for the top ten that the Spectator will crown with honors. The first year, I asked you to post your guesses in the comments. Last year, I had you email me with your guesses. This year, I think going back to the original format will be best.

So, start commenting away on what you think will be in the top ten, one entry per individual (but feel free to leave as many comments as you wish; after all, this is meant to be a dialogue). I used to give a six-pack of really low scoring wines as the prize. Now I’m going to let you choose your own (don’t worry, I still carry many low scoring wines…) with the $75 gift certificate to domaine547.com or domaineLA that you’ll earn.

FYI, I would put some money on the Red Car Heaven and Earth Pinot Noir being in the list somewhere, but not the top ten since it’s too small production (let’s say it’s top 50). I also think we’ll see some 2007 Chateauneufs, very few (if any) wines from Bordeaux in the top 10, and perhaps a surprise appearance from a 2008 German Riesling.

Now, guess away!

Is This For Real? Or has April Fool’s Day Come Late For Wine Spectator?

Wednesday, April 22nd, 2009

I saw a headline in my RSS reader today and clicked on over to the Wine Spectator to read about an “amazing” $8 Pinot Noir that James Laube apparently tasted blind. The ensuing blog entry started out well enough, but then I read a few lines that made me wonder if it could be a joke. Read it for yourself by clicking here (membership to the Wine Spectator site required to read the full article).

For your general enjoyment, and for those of you lacking access to WS, I’m taking the liberty of including a few paragraphs here (at least until cease and desist orders come my way) that stand out to me as…well, as Onion-like in their tone:

The wine was aged with oak chips instead of in oak barrels, which give it a very subtle spicy wood edge. “I really focus on the taste and complexity that I’m getting.” To achieve the right flavor profile he adds what he described as simply “red blending wine.”

When I asked him what grapes were in the “red blending wine,” Broman insisted he didn’t know, but that it’s common to buy bulk wine samples that have already been assembled, and the percentage of blending wine added is small enough that the wine can legally be labeled as Pinot Noir.

“We don’t know [what grapes] they are,” he said. “It sounds like I’m being evasive, but I don’t know what it is. We’re simply focusing on the flavor.”–excerpted from James Laube Unfined, 4/22/09

I’m actually certain this isn’t some sort of late-April Fool’s joke, and that Laube indeed loved this “yummy” 2008 RedTree California Pinot Noir (with a dash of some other grape varieties in it that the winemaker can’t even identify).

And while there’s a strange kind of honor in Laube’s admittal that he was wowed by a blindly-tasted-wine of unlikely (or less-than-elite) origins, there’s something kind of (really!) disturbing about his subsequent statement that it doesn’t really matter what’s in the wine, as long as it tastes good (can oak chips ever be a good thing? Really? And could he not tell the wine was artificially oaked?).

More so than just endorsing iffy modes of production, Laube is commending what amounts to a simulacrum of wine in general, and Pinot Noir in specific, rather than an authentic product.

get your wine on

2008 “Bebame” Red, El Dorado County, California

Cabernet Franc (65%) and Gamay (35%) from - gasp - California! And only 13% ABV, pretty modest by California standards. If I tasted this blind I would probably have said it’s from the Loire Valley. It has pretty much nothing in common with the full bodied iterations of Cab Franc coming out of Napa. Juicy, light, delicious quaffing wine.$18 a bottle

2006 Telegramme Chateauneuf-du-Pape Rouge

Really balanced and smooth, this is a bargain of a Chateauneuf. Yeah, the 07s are lauded but what would I prefer to drink? This! It’s the second label of Vieux Telegraphe, from the same property but from younger vines. And it’s a deal at $33 a bottle.2006 or bust!

NV Barcino Cava: LA Times Wine of the Week!

Delicious and just in time for New Year’s Eve…this is the LA Times Wine of the Week, and we have plenty in stock. Order online, pick-up in-store!$14 a bottle!

Sign up for our awesome newsletter!



Email Marketing by VerticalResponse

freshly pressed

The Business of Saying No:

No, I am not a natural wine merchant.

And no, I am also not not a natural wine merchant.

So what exactly is my store, Domaine LA? This is a tricky question that I try to answer here.
________

A couple of months back, I participated in the first annual Los Angeles Natural Wine Week, spearheaded by Lou Amdur of Lou Wine Bar. At that time, I took some heat from a few folks around the Internet who felt I might have been merely capitalizing on a trend and didn’t see me as a true natural wine merchant.

The thing is, I’ve never claimed to be a natural wine merchant. When I started my business online a few years ago, I stated plainly that I wanted to sell wines I loved. I was an enthusiast with a fairly receptive, wide-ranging palate, and I considered learning about wine a journey I would be going on alongside my customers. While I’ve since expanded my business to include a brick and mortar space, my self-conception and mission statement haven’t really changed. But my palate has.

To be absolutely blunt about it, I used to love wines that I simply can’t stomach anymore. There are blog posts archived on my website that in retrospect make me cringe, paragraphs singing the praises of some of the most blatantly manipulated wines in the world. I once criticized a wine bar for not having any Southern Hemisphere selections; it’s now my favorite spot in Los Angeles. And today I carry barely a dozen Southern Hemisphere SKUs myself.

By and large, my palate-shift is reflected in what I bring into the store. Chris Ringland and Mollydooker have been replaced by Eric Texier and Thierry Puzelat; the California fruit- and alcohol-bombs, for the most part, have given way to wines from La Clarine Farm, Donkey and Goat and LIOCO.

As a result of my largely obscure inventory, almost every day I’m faced with customers asking for items that I don’t stock. On a regular basis, I hear:

“Do you have Rombauer Chardonnay?”

No, I answer.

“Do you have Caymus?”

Afraid not, I reply.

“What about Blackstone Merlot?”

So sorry, but no.

“Where’s the Veuve Clicquot? This is a gift. I need the recipient to know it’s nice!”

Sigh.

Saying no to people sets up a potentially risky relationship that may start and end with that one exchange—many customers want what they want and aren’t open to alternative suggestions. In other cases, however, that simple “no” can be the beginning of something beautiful, a dialogue that winds up with a customer who came in looking for the Prisoner instead going home with something like Morgan Twain-Peterson’s Bedrock Heirloom Red, a wine which, while perhaps not 100% natural, is a more honest “made in the vineyard” (yes, I know this is also a cliché) version of what the Prisoner purports to be.

Of course, sometimes that customer really just wants the Prisoner. Which leads me to my major confession here: despite more than a bit of ambivalence, I continue to sell the Prisoner, along with other wines that are by no means natural, wines that are quite frankly manufactured. The Prisoner sits on the shelf right next to the Bedrock Heirloom Red, and for the time being, it will stay there. At least twice a week people come in asking specifically for this wine, and, for several reasons, it’s a request I’m not—yet—willing to deny.

Even though I no longer drink the Prisoner, there was a time–not too long ago–when I did so happily. When I first started getting interested in wine, it was a bottle that captured my imagination and helped launch me on the journey I remain committed to today. So maybe I keep the Prisoner around out of a sense of nostalgia. Or maybe I keep it around to remind me how far I’ve come. Maybe I keep it around hoping that for those who ask for it, it will simply be their starting place just as it was mine.

Or, more cynically, maybe I keep it around because people buy it. Maybe it’s a crutch to lean on when I’m too tired to hand-sell the less familiar items on my shelves. Seeing something recognizable is comforting to consumers, and that comfort somehow lends me credibility; credibility is a precedent to trust. Trust is what enables me to recommend something different to a customer who normally drinks the Prisoner.

In this sense, the Prisoner is of great value to me, not just as an easy sell, but even more so as a gateway to all the other wines I have available. I don’t know that I’d be able to move as much of the Bedrock, an unknown wine with a tiny case production, without the Prisoner right next to it.
______

Saying no is extremely hard. Right now, I’m willing to do so 90% of the time, maybe even 95%. Call me a coward or a fake if you want. But I know where I started out, and it’s been a logical evolution. And while I’m headed in a particular direction, guided by my palate, it’s safe to assume I won’t ever be a 100% “natural wine merchant.”

I like to think there’s room for somebody like me—somebody with confidence in her tastes, who also takes into account modes of production in buying decisions; someone who has a particular point of view, yet retains an inclusive attitude. I am strong in my opinions, and enthusiastic in my passions. I never judge my customers, and hope that they’ll be as open-minded and respectful of my offerings as I am of their preferences.

So far, it seems to be working out. In recent months, I’ve brought in only one case of the Prisoner (less than a thousandth of a percent of its total production) for every three cases of the Bedrock (1.3% of its total production).

So, what am I?

I’m not a natural wine merchant. And I’m not not a natural wine merchant.

I’m a work in progress. And I’m okay with that.

wine jargon

Frizzante
From Wikipedia: Frizzante is an Italian wine term term for semi-sparkling wine (as opposed to Spumante, which is generally used for fully sparkling wines). Frizzante wines generally owe their bubbles to a partial secondary fermentation in tank. You might notice a light fizz or tingly sensation on the tongue with a Frizzante wine, compared to the more carbonated sensation that more fully sparkling wines yield.


Scorekage
Okay, so we made up this word yesterday after a great restaurant experience. We brought a bottle of wine with us, expecting to pay a corkage fee. But the restaurant either forgot to charge us the $15, or decided to be nice to us. We scored! Hence, “scorekage” has entered our lexicon. This can also refer to BYO friendly restaurants that don’t charge for corkage under any circumstances.


Frizzante


March 29th, 2008

Scorekage


March 23rd, 2008

Rioja


March 3rd, 2008

grapewise

DomaineLA Store Contact Info
If you’re looking for our brick and mortar shop, here’s where it can be found:

6801 Melrose Avenue

Los Angeles, CA 90038

(323) 932-0280

Hours are 11AM to 8PM, Monday through Saturday and noon to 5PM on Sundays.

Read more…

Fabulous & Frugal!
Our friends launched a new site and domaine547 is a featured wine columnist in their premiere edition! Go check out Fabulous & Frugal for some fantastic lifestyle tips for living the good life during what, for most of us, is an economically challenging time. There’s much more than wine there, and we’re thrilled to be a small part of the start of what will surely be a successful venture. Congrats to Brandi & Steph for their achievement!

Read more…