The Rockaway Blogging Controversy: Whatsit All About?
The Great Whatsit, Wine blogs, Wine Spectator, WLTV
We can’t even begin to untangle the mess that has resulted from the experimental program to release a wine (Rodney Strong’s Rockaway Cab) to select bloggers in advance of the traditional media. Can’t, and won’t. That’s right! If you think d547 is a place to contemplate your wine blogging navel, look elsewhere.
We’re convinced that there is fun to be had in the wine blogosphere, and hope that anybody confused or upset by the various incidents (see here, here and here for a few - and now here too!) can look to us to help restore their faith in the online wine world.
On second thought, this whole Rockaway thing gets our wheels turning. As business-minded folk, we can see that it’s not necessarily bad to be at the center of a shitstorm. So we’ve decided to follow Rodney Strong’s lead by offering a special opportunity for bloggers to discuss our new wine, The Great Whatsit. If interested, email us. Of course there are no strings attached.
Except the following:
1. You must review the wine using a Mad Libs-style sheet that allows you to fill in the blanks with descriptors (choices include terms such as “hedonistic,” “voluptuous,” “supple and velvety tannins” as well as “dark berry,” “fruit forward,” and “Rhone-like”).
2. You will have flexibility in scoring the wine, so long as you use our patented ten point scale (90 to 100).
3. You will not have to review the wine in a particular time-frame, and can in fact pick the week that works best for you; the schedule will be one blogger per week, from now until December, first come first served. That will ensure that we have the wine mentioned in prominent wine blogs from now until the holidays thankyouverymuch (after all, six blog posts — nearly simultaneously — hardly makes for a proper media blitz).
4. In fact, if you prefer not to review the wine at all, you can opt to write about how amazing Jill is, or how fantastic the label art is, or how domaine547 is breaking new barriers with this whole “private label” concept.
5. It goes without saying, you must link to our store’s page for the wine, though don’t worry! You are not going to profit at all (we’re protecting your integrity) as we will not be offering any sort of affiliate-like percentage for outclicks from your blog that result in sales of The Great Whatsit.
6. Should controversy not erupt over this program, we hope that you will consider posting something about it on the Wine Spectator boards where things seem to get interesting. Similarly, you might also post over on the Wine Library boards (but don’t go asking for any spare nickels to go on the Thunder Cruise or you’ll get what’s coming to you).
That’s it. Pretty simple we think. Oh, and the revolutionary part of this is that you need to do items one through six without even having tasted the wine. That’s right - we’re not going to give out any free bottles of The Great Whatsit, since accepting a sample might compromise your integrity…as for us, don’t worry — we checked our integrity at the door a long time ago.
6 Responses to “The Rockaway Blogging Controversy: Whatsit All About?”
Leave a Reply
get your wine on
2008 “Bebame” Red, El Dorado County, California
Cabernet Franc (65%) and Gamay (35%) from - gasp - California! And only 13% ABV, pretty modest by California standards. If I tasted this blind I would probably have said it’s from the Loire Valley. It has pretty much nothing in common with the full bodied iterations of Cab Franc coming out of Napa. Juicy, light, delicious quaffing wine.$18 a bottle
2006 Telegramme Chateauneuf-du-Pape Rouge
Really balanced and smooth, this is a bargain of a Chateauneuf. Yeah, the 07s are lauded but what would I prefer to drink? This! It’s the second label of Vieux Telegraphe, from the same property but from younger vines. And it’s a deal at $33 a bottle.2006 or bust!
NV Barcino Cava: LA Times Wine of the Week!
Delicious and just in time for New Year’s Eve…this is the LA Times Wine of the Week, and we have plenty in stock. Order online, pick-up in-store!$14 a bottle!
Search
freshly pressed
The Business of Saying No:
No, I am not a natural wine merchant.
And no, I am also not not a natural wine merchant.
So what exactly is my store, Domaine LA? This is a tricky question that I try to answer here.
________
A couple of months back, I participated in the first annual Los Angeles Natural Wine Week, spearheaded by Lou Amdur of Lou Wine Bar. At that time, I took some heat from a few folks around the Internet who felt I might have been merely capitalizing on a trend and didn’t see me as a true natural wine merchant.
The thing is, I’ve never claimed to be a natural wine merchant. When I started my business online a few years ago, I stated plainly that I wanted to sell wines I loved. I was an enthusiast with a fairly receptive, wide-ranging palate, and I considered learning about wine a journey I would be going on alongside my customers. While I’ve since expanded my business to include a brick and mortar space, my self-conception and mission statement haven’t really changed. But my palate has.
To be absolutely blunt about it, I used to love wines that I simply can’t stomach anymore. There are blog posts archived on my website that in retrospect make me cringe, paragraphs singing the praises of some of the most blatantly manipulated wines in the world. I once criticized a wine bar for not having any Southern Hemisphere selections; it’s now my favorite spot in Los Angeles. And today I carry barely a dozen Southern Hemisphere SKUs myself.
By and large, my palate-shift is reflected in what I bring into the store. Chris Ringland and Mollydooker have been replaced by Eric Texier and Thierry Puzelat; the California fruit- and alcohol-bombs, for the most part, have given way to wines from La Clarine Farm, Donkey and Goat and LIOCO.
As a result of my largely obscure inventory, almost every day I’m faced with customers asking for items that I don’t stock. On a regular basis, I hear:
“Do you have Rombauer Chardonnay?”
No, I answer.
“Do you have Caymus?”
Afraid not, I reply.
“What about Blackstone Merlot?”
So sorry, but no.
“Where’s the Veuve Clicquot? This is a gift. I need the recipient to know it’s nice!”
Sigh.
Saying no to people sets up a potentially risky relationship that may start and end with that one exchange—many customers want what they want and aren’t open to alternative suggestions. In other cases, however, that simple “no” can be the beginning of something beautiful, a dialogue that winds up with a customer who came in looking for the Prisoner instead going home with something like Morgan Twain-Peterson’s Bedrock Heirloom Red, a wine which, while perhaps not 100% natural, is a more honest “made in the vineyard” (yes, I know this is also a cliché) version of what the Prisoner purports to be.
Of course, sometimes that customer really just wants the Prisoner. Which leads me to my major confession here: despite more than a bit of ambivalence, I continue to sell the Prisoner, along with other wines that are by no means natural, wines that are quite frankly manufactured. The Prisoner sits on the shelf right next to the Bedrock Heirloom Red, and for the time being, it will stay there. At least twice a week people come in asking specifically for this wine, and, for several reasons, it’s a request I’m not—yet—willing to deny.

Even though I no longer drink the Prisoner, there was a time–not too long ago–when I did so happily. When I first started getting interested in wine, it was a bottle that captured my imagination and helped launch me on the journey I remain committed to today. So maybe I keep the Prisoner around out of a sense of nostalgia. Or maybe I keep it around to remind me how far I’ve come. Maybe I keep it around hoping that for those who ask for it, it will simply be their starting place just as it was mine.
Or, more cynically, maybe I keep it around because people buy it. Maybe it’s a crutch to lean on when I’m too tired to hand-sell the less familiar items on my shelves. Seeing something recognizable is comforting to consumers, and that comfort somehow lends me credibility; credibility is a precedent to trust. Trust is what enables me to recommend something different to a customer who normally drinks the Prisoner.
In this sense, the Prisoner is of great value to me, not just as an easy sell, but even more so as a gateway to all the other wines I have available. I don’t know that I’d be able to move as much of the Bedrock, an unknown wine with a tiny case production, without the Prisoner right next to it.
______
Saying no is extremely hard. Right now, I’m willing to do so 90% of the time, maybe even 95%. Call me a coward or a fake if you want. But I know where I started out, and it’s been a logical evolution. And while I’m headed in a particular direction, guided by my palate, it’s safe to assume I won’t ever be a 100% “natural wine merchant.”
I like to think there’s room for somebody like me—somebody with confidence in her tastes, who also takes into account modes of production in buying decisions; someone who has a particular point of view, yet retains an inclusive attitude. I am strong in my opinions, and enthusiastic in my passions. I never judge my customers, and hope that they’ll be as open-minded and respectful of my offerings as I am of their preferences.
So far, it seems to be working out. In recent months, I’ve brought in only one case of the Prisoner (less than a thousandth of a percent of its total production) for every three cases of the Bedrock (1.3% of its total production).
So, what am I?
I’m not a natural wine merchant. And I’m not not a natural wine merchant.
I’m a work in progress. And I’m okay with that.
The Business of Saying No
Los Angeles Natural Wine Week: Taste California Terroir on 5/15/2010 at Heath Ceramics
Meet the Reps: Amy Atwood
wine jargon
Frizzante
From Wikipedia: Frizzante is an Italian wine term term for semi-sparkling wine (as opposed to Spumante, which is generally used for fully sparkling wines). Frizzante wines generally owe their bubbles to a partial secondary fermentation in tank. You might notice a light fizz or tingly sensation on the tongue with a Frizzante wine, compared to the more carbonated sensation that more fully sparkling wines yield.
Scorekage
Okay, so we made up this word yesterday after a great restaurant experience. We brought a bottle of wine with us, expecting to pay a corkage fee. But the restaurant either forgot to charge us the $15, or decided to be nice to us. We scored! Hence, “scorekage” has entered our lexicon. This can also refer to BYO friendly restaurants that don’t charge for corkage under any circumstances.
grapewise
DomaineLA Store Contact Info
If you’re looking for our brick and mortar shop, here’s where it can be found:
(323) 932-0280
Hours are 11AM to 8PM, Monday through Saturday and noon to 5PM on Sundays.
Read more…Fabulous & Frugal!
Our friends launched a new site and domaine547 is a featured wine columnist in their premiere edition! Go check out Fabulous & Frugal for some fantastic lifestyle tips for living the good life during what, for most of us, is an economically challenging time. There’s much more than wine there, and we’re thrilled to be a small part of the start of what will surely be a successful venture. Congrats to Brandi & Steph for their achievement!
DomaineLA Store Contact Info
Fabulous & Frugal!
domaine547 In the Blogosphere! Imbibe Magazine Unfiltered
August 29th, 2008 at 8:48 am
I’m in!
One condition - I must be called unethical at least 5 times.
Deal?
August 29th, 2008 at 9:51 am
Congratulations on taking this controversy to a new, humorous level. This is all uncharted territory, so the degree of controversy should be taken as an overall positive.
Now about the Great Whatsit, will a review over 80 points also bring an opportunity to “enhance” said review with a paid label reprocution that is run without being labeled an advertisment?
August 29th, 2008 at 11:03 am
1WineDude - unethical is my middle name! Word.
Tish - you totally misunderstood our conditions. It’s 90 points, not 80 so get with the program. However, you otherwise bring up a good point. We will happily pay for label reproduction/placement within said pieces, and prefer that they not be labeled as paid advertisements. We also have head shots, images of Budo-kun, and pre-written copy available for all takers. Thank you for bringing this up.
August 29th, 2008 at 12:28 pm
Jill,
Brilliant satire; thanks.
August 29th, 2008 at 4:58 pm
This is the first thing that’s made me chuckle in approximately 4 days. Thanks, Jill. Plus, I owe 1WineDude some wine for his investigative journalism–I’ll be getting in touch shortly. Maybe the Great Whatsit??
August 29th, 2008 at 5:18 pm
Thank god SOMEONE is bringing comic relief to the situation! I mean besides 1WineDude and his big head.
Cheers Jill!