2004 Castellare Chianti Classico: file this under “whoops”
Castellare, Chianti, Italian wine, Low scoring wines, whoops
We’ve had the 2004 Castellare Chianti Classico on our minds ever since tasting it at the Winebow trade tasting of their Italian portfolio. We were impressed by the wine, as was our tasting partner for the day. You can read our write-up here, and our tasting partner’s here.
Finally, last week, we got it in stock and went to enter it into inventory this weekend. As a matter of course, we decided to look up the scores in the wine trades. Yes, we actually buy wine because we like it, before we’ve even checked out the Speculator and such. And perhaps that’s a good thing, because who knows if we would have brought it in had we seen the 78 points it received from the Wine Spectator’s James Suckling, with the following notes:
“Lean and vegetal, with some fruit. Bitter. Tasted four times, with consistent notes. Tasted twice, with consistent notes.”
We’re not even sure what this means. Did Suckling taste it two times, or four times? Or did he taste it two plus four times? The 2004 doesn’t appear to have been scored by the Wine Advocate, though recent vintages have scored consistently in the mid to high 80s (interesting to see that in consideration of our Spanish tasting last year that revealed similar gaps between WS and WA scores for that country as well).
Whatever the case, we can say the following: we tasted the 2004 Castellare Chianti Classico once, with consistent notes. The wine, to us, is a fine representation of Sangiovese. It’s full of sour cherry, and tastes correct for the region. It’s decidedly Italian, and not in a newfangled Super-Tuscan kind of way, but showing the dirty, truffled, wild boar and slightly acidic biting elements we associate with the terroir. This is not at all a hard wine to drink, but it never lets you forget you’re drinking it — and we mean that in a very good way.
We’ll probably have a tough time selling this wine now, just based on the score — that is, unless you decide to trust a wine retailer’s judgment over a wine magazine’s in making your purchase. We’re not sure we’ve reached that level of trust with most of you yet, but that won’t stop us from stocking the 78-pointers that we feel deserve a place on our shelves. After all, if worse comes to worst and it doesn’t sell, we can always drink the Castellare Chianti ourselves, and we’ll enjoy it immensely.
5 Responses to “2004 Castellare Chianti Classico: file this under “whoops””
Leave a Reply
get your wine on
2008 “Bebame” Red, El Dorado County, California
Cabernet Franc (65%) and Gamay (35%) from - gasp - California! And only 13% ABV, pretty modest by California standards. If I tasted this blind I would probably have said it’s from the Loire Valley. It has pretty much nothing in common with the full bodied iterations of Cab Franc coming out of Napa. Juicy, light, delicious quaffing wine.$18 a bottle
2006 Telegramme Chateauneuf-du-Pape Rouge
Really balanced and smooth, this is a bargain of a Chateauneuf. Yeah, the 07s are lauded but what would I prefer to drink? This! It’s the second label of Vieux Telegraphe, from the same property but from younger vines. And it’s a deal at $33 a bottle.2006 or bust!
NV Barcino Cava: LA Times Wine of the Week!
Delicious and just in time for New Year’s Eve…this is the LA Times Wine of the Week, and we have plenty in stock. Order online, pick-up in-store!$14 a bottle!
Search
freshly pressed
3/8/10: First domaineLA Wine Tasting at Susan Feniger’s Street: 5 Wines, $15:
Just a quick note to let you know that a week from today, on Monday, March 8th, 2010, I’ll be hosting the first domaineLA wine tasting event at Susan Feniger’s Street, with the Manincor winery of Italy. The importer and winemaker will both be present to chat about the five wines being poured (including an unusual and delicious dry moscato), and the wines will be paired with light bites.
The best news is that the event will cost just $15 a person…a bargain! Swing by between 6PM and 8PM — I hope to see lots of you there!
Susan Feniger’s Street, 742 N. Highland Avenue, Los Angeles, CA 90038
Oh, and you can buy tickets in advance, online by clicking here:

3/8/10: First domaineLA Wine Tasting at Susan Feniger’s Street: 5 Wines, $15
Wine Retail and Social Media: Yeah, I Should Be Blogging…
Free Corkage Alert! Umami Burger and domaineLA
wine jargon
Frizzante
From Wikipedia: Frizzante is an Italian wine term term for semi-sparkling wine (as opposed to Spumante, which is generally used for fully sparkling wines). Frizzante wines generally owe their bubbles to a partial secondary fermentation in tank. You might notice a light fizz or tingly sensation on the tongue with a Frizzante wine, compared to the more carbonated sensation that more fully sparkling wines yield.
Scorekage
Okay, so we made up this word yesterday after a great restaurant experience. We brought a bottle of wine with us, expecting to pay a corkage fee. But the restaurant either forgot to charge us the $15, or decided to be nice to us. We scored! Hence, “scorekage” has entered our lexicon. This can also refer to BYO friendly restaurants that don’t charge for corkage under any circumstances.
grapewise
DomaineLA Store Contact Info
If you’re looking for our brick and mortar shop, here’s where it can be found:
(323) 932-0280
Hours are 11AM to 8PM, Monday through Saturday and noon to 5PM on Sundays.
Read more…Fabulous & Frugal!
Our friends launched a new site and domaine547 is a featured wine columnist in their premiere edition! Go check out Fabulous & Frugal for some fantastic lifestyle tips for living the good life during what, for most of us, is an economically challenging time. There’s much more than wine there, and we’re thrilled to be a small part of the start of what will surely be a successful venture. Congrats to Brandi & Steph for their achievement!
DomaineLA Store Contact Info
Fabulous & Frugal!
domaine547 In the Blogosphere! Imbibe Magazine Unfiltered
April 7th, 2008 at 9:08 am
Great post! I hope to try this wine myself just once, or maybe twice, but let’s see if I ever get to four times
April 8th, 2008 at 8:11 am
This is such an interesting issue. We all SAY we want more than just scores but are we brave enough to carry through? I hope so, because I thought this wine was terrific (and I’ll help you drink it if you need support!)
April 10th, 2008 at 4:50 pm
“We’re not sure we’ve reached that level of trust with most of you yet”
It’s by stocking them and letting other know that you liked that you get *that* level of trust!
I cannot find this wine in Portugal but I’ll be looking forward to try it next trip out.
April 10th, 2008 at 8:08 pm
Honesty will get you everywhere. Sometimes a wine that gets poor scores from the press can be a winner for the wine drinking public. The prices become more reasonable, and more folks are exposed to the wine.
Thanks for sharing this experience with all. Many retailers would simply put a misleading shelftalker on the wine, and hope no one looks to see if it is the correct year. Cheers! WineGent
April 16th, 2008 at 7:42 pm
I had this just a few weeks ago. I thought it was a really enjoyable sangiovese. A little sour, sure, but it is a Chianti; I always think they are a little sour.
78? Just seems goofy to me. If you shipped to PA, I would certainly order some. Hey, maybe I should bring up shipping laws next time someone from Clinton or Obama’s campaign calls my house.