An inconvenient truth? Chris Jordan’s photos and wine consumption statistics

We like drinking wine. We like drinking wine a lot. Of course we put all our empty bottles into our blue recycling bin, and assume that it gets carted off to a plant where the glass will be re-used in some form or another. But what about all those bottles that don’t get recycled? We have relatives who live in St. Louis, and they have to pay extra for curbside recycling, hiring a private contractor since the city doesn’t offer such services. Therefore, they don’t recycle. And they drink plenty of wine (and soda, and water).
Dr. Vino tried to address the issue of the carbon footprint of wine-drinking a little while back, by giving up drinking bottled water for a month. We applaud such efforts, and do our best to bring our own reusable 32 oz. water bottles to the gym (though we do fill these bottles from a 5 gallon Arrowhead dispenser rather than tap water). However, these efforts must surely amount to a tiny dent in what is a huge problem.
We don’t want to get too preachy here. But we did want to raise this issue, which we’ve been thinking about ever since looking at the new photographs from an artist we love, Chris Jordan. Chris’s images in the past have dealt with industrial American landscapes, mountains of discarded cell phones, heaps of broken glass, empty shipping containers. His newest series, called “Running the Numbers: An American Self-Portrait” takes this one step further, contextualizing these mounds of disposables with statistics that imbue the quite orderly and beautiful images with horrifying meaning.
Take a peek at this photograph, and then imagine what the pile filled with wine bottles rather than water and soda.
Plastic Bottles, 2007
60×120″
Depicts two million plastic beverage bottles, the number used in the US every five minutes.
Now, if the above looks a little bit too much like a blur, take a peek at a detail from the photo:
And let’s take it one step further:
Keep in mind, the above photograph is ten feet long. TEN feet. And that it represents 2 million bottles for every five minutes! This puts Dr. Vino’s experiment in a whole new context.
We don’t really know what to say, or what to do. Wine consumption in the US is rising, and that’s a good thing for our business, and a good thing for wine culture. in 2004, Americans were already consuming 3.25 billion bottles of wine a year; but still, only 1 in 7 adults drinks wine regularly, and therefore there remains tremendous room for growth. Our first instinct is to feel guilty, since we realize that our business basically amounts to proselytizing that people should drink more wine and therefore create more waste in the form of glass bottles.
But we’ve done the math, and the numbers are very much in wine’s favor. In 2004, if Americans drank 270 million cases of wine a year, they drank approximately 9 million bottles a day, 375,000 bottles an hour, or 6,250 bottles a minute. Compared to the 2 million plastic bottles every five minutes, wine clocks in at about 31,250 every five minutes. Even with growth in the double digits over the last few years, we’re still talking under 50,000 bottles every five minutes, or 2.5% of the plastic bottle photograph. Instead of being ten feet long, an equivalent wine bottle photograph would be merely 3 inches long.
So while we continue to worry and ponder what to do about the 2 million bottles discarded every five minutes, the fifteen million sheets of office paper used every five minutes, or the 426,000 cell phones that are retired every day, we think we’ve figured out the perfect thing to do to ease our stress: open a bottle of locally produced California wine (small carbon footprint!), drink a few glasses, and at least feel comfortable with the fact that we’re part of a community that, although growing, is not yet consuming at the alarming rate worthy of one of Chris Jordan’s masterful photographs.
And we think we’ll switch from that Arrowhead cooler to filtered tap water when filling our reusable water bottles. Please consider buying your own.
10 Responses to “An inconvenient truth? Chris Jordan’s photos and wine consumption statistics”
Leave a Reply
get your wine on
2008 “Bebame” Red, El Dorado County, California
Cabernet Franc (65%) and Gamay (35%) from - gasp - California! And only 13% ABV, pretty modest by California standards. If I tasted this blind I would probably have said it’s from the Loire Valley. It has pretty much nothing in common with the full bodied iterations of Cab Franc coming out of Napa. Juicy, light, delicious quaffing wine.$18 a bottle
2006 Telegramme Chateauneuf-du-Pape Rouge
Really balanced and smooth, this is a bargain of a Chateauneuf. Yeah, the 07s are lauded but what would I prefer to drink? This! It’s the second label of Vieux Telegraphe, from the same property but from younger vines. And it’s a deal at $33 a bottle.2006 or bust!
NV Barcino Cava: LA Times Wine of the Week!
Delicious and just in time for New Year’s Eve…this is the LA Times Wine of the Week, and we have plenty in stock. Order online, pick-up in-store!$14 a bottle!
Search
freshly pressed
The Business of Saying No:
No, I am not a natural wine merchant.
And no, I am also not not a natural wine merchant.
So what exactly is my store, Domaine LA? This is a tricky question that I try to answer here.
________
A couple of months back, I participated in the first annual Los Angeles Natural Wine Week, spearheaded by Lou Amdur of Lou Wine Bar. At that time, I took some heat from a few folks around the Internet who felt I might have been merely capitalizing on a trend and didn’t see me as a true natural wine merchant.
The thing is, I’ve never claimed to be a natural wine merchant. When I started my business online a few years ago, I stated plainly that I wanted to sell wines I loved. I was an enthusiast with a fairly receptive, wide-ranging palate, and I considered learning about wine a journey I would be going on alongside my customers. While I’ve since expanded my business to include a brick and mortar space, my self-conception and mission statement haven’t really changed. But my palate has.
To be absolutely blunt about it, I used to love wines that I simply can’t stomach anymore. There are blog posts archived on my website that in retrospect make me cringe, paragraphs singing the praises of some of the most blatantly manipulated wines in the world. I once criticized a wine bar for not having any Southern Hemisphere selections; it’s now my favorite spot in Los Angeles. And today I carry barely a dozen Southern Hemisphere SKUs myself.
By and large, my palate-shift is reflected in what I bring into the store. Chris Ringland and Mollydooker have been replaced by Eric Texier and Thierry Puzelat; the California fruit- and alcohol-bombs, for the most part, have given way to wines from La Clarine Farm, Donkey and Goat and LIOCO.
As a result of my largely obscure inventory, almost every day I’m faced with customers asking for items that I don’t stock. On a regular basis, I hear:
“Do you have Rombauer Chardonnay?”
No, I answer.
“Do you have Caymus?”
Afraid not, I reply.
“What about Blackstone Merlot?”
So sorry, but no.
“Where’s the Veuve Clicquot? This is a gift. I need the recipient to know it’s nice!”
Sigh.
Saying no to people sets up a potentially risky relationship that may start and end with that one exchange—many customers want what they want and aren’t open to alternative suggestions. In other cases, however, that simple “no” can be the beginning of something beautiful, a dialogue that winds up with a customer who came in looking for the Prisoner instead going home with something like Morgan Twain-Peterson’s Bedrock Heirloom Red, a wine which, while perhaps not 100% natural, is a more honest “made in the vineyard” (yes, I know this is also a cliché) version of what the Prisoner purports to be.
Of course, sometimes that customer really just wants the Prisoner. Which leads me to my major confession here: despite more than a bit of ambivalence, I continue to sell the Prisoner, along with other wines that are by no means natural, wines that are quite frankly manufactured. The Prisoner sits on the shelf right next to the Bedrock Heirloom Red, and for the time being, it will stay there. At least twice a week people come in asking specifically for this wine, and, for several reasons, it’s a request I’m not—yet—willing to deny.

Even though I no longer drink the Prisoner, there was a time–not too long ago–when I did so happily. When I first started getting interested in wine, it was a bottle that captured my imagination and helped launch me on the journey I remain committed to today. So maybe I keep the Prisoner around out of a sense of nostalgia. Or maybe I keep it around to remind me how far I’ve come. Maybe I keep it around hoping that for those who ask for it, it will simply be their starting place just as it was mine.
Or, more cynically, maybe I keep it around because people buy it. Maybe it’s a crutch to lean on when I’m too tired to hand-sell the less familiar items on my shelves. Seeing something recognizable is comforting to consumers, and that comfort somehow lends me credibility; credibility is a precedent to trust. Trust is what enables me to recommend something different to a customer who normally drinks the Prisoner.
In this sense, the Prisoner is of great value to me, not just as an easy sell, but even more so as a gateway to all the other wines I have available. I don’t know that I’d be able to move as much of the Bedrock, an unknown wine with a tiny case production, without the Prisoner right next to it.
______
Saying no is extremely hard. Right now, I’m willing to do so 90% of the time, maybe even 95%. Call me a coward or a fake if you want. But I know where I started out, and it’s been a logical evolution. And while I’m headed in a particular direction, guided by my palate, it’s safe to assume I won’t ever be a 100% “natural wine merchant.”
I like to think there’s room for somebody like me—somebody with confidence in her tastes, who also takes into account modes of production in buying decisions; someone who has a particular point of view, yet retains an inclusive attitude. I am strong in my opinions, and enthusiastic in my passions. I never judge my customers, and hope that they’ll be as open-minded and respectful of my offerings as I am of their preferences.
So far, it seems to be working out. In recent months, I’ve brought in only one case of the Prisoner (less than a thousandth of a percent of its total production) for every three cases of the Bedrock (1.3% of its total production).
So, what am I?
I’m not a natural wine merchant. And I’m not not a natural wine merchant.
I’m a work in progress. And I’m okay with that.
The Business of Saying No
Los Angeles Natural Wine Week: Taste California Terroir on 5/15/2010 at Heath Ceramics
Meet the Reps: Amy Atwood
wine jargon
Frizzante
From Wikipedia: Frizzante is an Italian wine term term for semi-sparkling wine (as opposed to Spumante, which is generally used for fully sparkling wines). Frizzante wines generally owe their bubbles to a partial secondary fermentation in tank. You might notice a light fizz or tingly sensation on the tongue with a Frizzante wine, compared to the more carbonated sensation that more fully sparkling wines yield.
Scorekage
Okay, so we made up this word yesterday after a great restaurant experience. We brought a bottle of wine with us, expecting to pay a corkage fee. But the restaurant either forgot to charge us the $15, or decided to be nice to us. We scored! Hence, “scorekage” has entered our lexicon. This can also refer to BYO friendly restaurants that don’t charge for corkage under any circumstances.
grapewise
DomaineLA Store Contact Info
If you’re looking for our brick and mortar shop, here’s where it can be found:
(323) 932-0280
Hours are 11AM to 8PM, Monday through Saturday and noon to 5PM on Sundays.
Read more…Fabulous & Frugal!
Our friends launched a new site and domaine547 is a featured wine columnist in their premiere edition! Go check out Fabulous & Frugal for some fantastic lifestyle tips for living the good life during what, for most of us, is an economically challenging time. There’s much more than wine there, and we’re thrilled to be a small part of the start of what will surely be a successful venture. Congrats to Brandi & Steph for their achievement!
DomaineLA Store Contact Info
Fabulous & Frugal!
domaine547 In the Blogosphere! Imbibe Magazine Unfiltered



July 16th, 2007 at 8:10 am
Made the switch to an under-sink water filter in the house three years ago and have never looked back. The filter costs $108 once a year, which pretty much pays for itself in a month if you drink bottled water like I used to drink bottled water. A few Nalgene bottles and hey presto, you’re doing a lot to reduce this problem.
And the California wine–that always helps!!
July 16th, 2007 at 8:18 am
It was nice when I moved to CA because recycling suddenly became so easy. Back home it was much more of an ordeal, and as I’m a born procrastinator it often didn’t happen.
Though I’ve found the downside to be that I’m sure my neighbors think I’m a wino with aaaallll those wine bottles in the bin. (Hey, I get to bring home leftovers from work whenever I want and they often don’t get drunk!)
July 16th, 2007 at 4:40 pm
Hey Domainiacs,
Thanks for the good post — and the props!
I really liked that photo series, which helps to put bottled water into a better perspective…Wonder how many times that goes to the moon and back?
Deb - Nalgene? I thought you were into Sigg? That’s why I got one!
Cheers,
Tyler
July 16th, 2007 at 9:06 pm
Dr. Debs, we have a water filter under our sink too, yet we got locked into a contract with Arrowhead that seems like it’s never ending. As soon as it runs out, we’ll use our GE spigot for daily water drinking.
Farley, we have the same problem with our neighbors…
Dr. Vino, thanks for checking in here. Let us know if you check out the Chris Jordan photo exhibit in person. Also, if you think the bottle photo is crazy, you should take a peek at his “Cans Seurat” image.
July 16th, 2007 at 10:03 pm
Interesting photos. The plastic bottles would look different here in Japan as we are required to remove the labels before placing them in the recycling bins. But then again, Japan is pretty forward thinking (in some aspects) of recycling - so after being here for so long I often forget how the US is still so reluctant about getting with the programme.
July 20th, 2007 at 12:01 am
What alternative to glass bottles for wine would you suggest? I am also woried by the many glass bottles thrown away and the cost of the packaging.
I recycle my bottles, but I am worried about those who do not and as illustrated by your plastic bottles, same counts for wine bottles.
In France you buy wine on tap with your own bottle. Might be a good idea to change the law in how it is sold.
July 24th, 2007 at 7:27 am
Just in: domaine547 is going to host a tasting party at the Paul Kopeikin Gallery in late September, while the gallery is displaying the Jordan photos! Details to follow soon. But if you’re in the LA area, please email info at domaine547 dot com and we’ll get you the skinny.
September 11th, 2007 at 6:22 am
[…] so this isn’t really wine related, but this is a brief follow-up to our earlier post on wine consumption and its environmental impact. However, we thought we’d let all you LA folks know that you can see the images we referred […]
January 15th, 2008 at 7:37 pm
4Ik3M8 hi great site thx http://peace.com
July 18th, 2008 at 9:30 am
Having transplanted from the east coast to the most recycle-friendly city in the country (I read that somewhere San Jose is the best recycler) I think there is an issue with ease of doing it.
In SJC, we can throw all recycles into 1 big bin and the facility sorts it. Done and done. You put 2 bins out on the street - recycle and garbage - and thats it.
Back east it was not only not easy but an actual royal pain in the ass - sorting, but only certain things!, multiple bins (like 4), etc…
Americans are spoiled and lazy (including me, tho you can add busy to that too). SJC has an awesome model and I don’t know why if the 10th largest city in the US can make it so easy then why can’t other?